Talk:Daniel/@comment-2605:A601:4F3:A100:E5FB:748B:221B:C78B-20180722002437

I'm watching The Maury Show is he Recaps the episode of Daniel and Christina. The 16 year old young man Daniel did not impregnate the 32 year-old Christina. But they did say they will continue to try to have a baby. Either way Christina is too old to have consensual sex with 16 year old boy. If it were the other way around and a 16 year old girl was impregnated by a 32 year old man I am sure the courts would be involved. Why is this case so different. Because the kid is persistent? The mother still has the power to prosecute this woman for sleeping with her son while he was a minor child. Statutory rape